Published 2009 | Version public
Book Section - Chapter

Perspectives on the architecture of continental crust from integrated field studies of exposed isobaric sections

Abstract

Depth-dependent variations in the structure and composition of continental crust can be studied via integrated investigations of isobaric terranes. In this contribution, we summarize three isobaric terranes in Archean to Proterozoic crust. In western Canada, 35–45-km-deep lower crust is exposed over an area of more than 20,000 km^2. The Upper Granite Gorge of Grand Canyon, Arizona, provides a transect of 20–25-km-deep middle crust. The Proterozoic basement of central Arizona represents an isobaric exposure of 10–15-km-deep middle crust. Isobaric terranes yield a conceptual image of continental crust that can be compared to seismic images, xenolith data, and drill core data to clarify rheology, coupling/decoupling of crustal levels, and the interplay between deformation, metamorphism, and plutonism. General observations include: (1) The crust is heterogeneous at all levels and cannot be accurately modeled as a simple progression from quartz-rich to feldspar-rich lithologies or from felsic to mafic bulk compositions. (2) The crust is segmented into foliation domains that alternate between steeply dipping and shallowly dipping. (3) Magmatism is expressed differently at different depths due to different background temperatures and a general upward distillation from mafic to felsic composition, and may be the most important control on crustal architecture and rheology. The strength of continental crust (and its potential for low-viscosity flow) is not simply a function of temperature, depth, and compositional layering, but is controlled by the size and distribution of rheological domains. The rheological character of a particular layer can vary in space and time at any crustal level.

Additional Information

© 2009 Geological Society of America. Accepted 24 February 2009. The authors thank Scott Johnson, David Schneider, and Bob Miller (Guest Editor) for their careful and very helpful reviews of an earlier draft of this manuscript. This paper has benefited from discussions with a large number of people including: S.A. Bowring, M. Jercinovic, R. Flowers, J. Baldwin, C. Hetherington, N. Price, C. Kopf, D. Gibson, P. Goncalves, and many others. Work in the Athabasca granulite terrane has been supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant EAR-0609935. Southwestern U.S. research has been supported by NSF EAR-9206045, 9508096, and 9305459. Electron Microprobe monazite geochronology technique development has been supported under EAR-0549639.

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
54331
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20150203-134244601

Related works

Describes
10.1130/2009.2456(08) (DOI)

Funding

NSF
EAR-0609935
NSF
EAR-9206045
NSF
EAR-9508096
NSF
EAR-9305459
NSF
EAR-0549639

Dates

Created
2015-02-04
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2021-11-10
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Series Name
Special papers (Geological Society of America)
Series Volume or Issue Number
456