A global fairtrade partnership needed to address injustices in the supply chains of clean energy technology materials
Abstract
Renewable sources produced close to one-third of the world’s electricity in 2023. However, a limited but growing body of research suggests rapid renewable energy development is leading to conflict and resource exploitation in energy-transitioning communities. Such injustices are attributable to the extractivist nature of renewable energy development, where raw materials, also known as Clean Energy Technology Materials (CETMs), are in limited quantities and often concentrated in resource-constrained zones in the Global South. In this perspective, we call for an urgent need for energy justice considerations in CETM’s supply chain. We used demand projection data from 2020 to 2040 to look into the effects of important CETMs like nickel, cobalt, and lithium on distributive justice. We also examined the potential of these effects to tackle systemic injustices such as conflict, labor exploitation, and transactional colonialism. Next, we analyzed global mining production data from the United States Geological Survey using a CETM life cycle lens and found that increasing demand for these materials is exacerbating restorative injustices, particularly in the Global South. Finally, building on the above evidence, we called for the creation of multi-stakeholder partnerships and the establishment of fair trade standards across the critical CETM supply chain.
Copyright and License (English)
Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funding (English)
RD thanks the support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1144], Energy Policy Research Group, CRASSH Research Grants [climaTRACES Lab] and Cambridge Zero.
Contributions (English)
C.C.N., J.J.W., and R.D. conceptualized the manuscript. C.C.N and J.J.W. wrote the original draft. C.C.N., J.J.W., and R.D., revised the manuscript.
Files
s43581-024-00113-2.pdf
Additional details
Funding
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
- OPP1144
- University of Cambridge
Dates
- Accepted
-
2024-08-29Accepted
- Available
-
2024-09-18Published online
Caltech Custom Metadata
- Publication Status
- In Press