Published August 1, 2019 | Version public
Journal Article

Direct Observations of Surface‐Wave Eigenfunctions at the Homestake 3D Array

  • 1. ROR icon University of Minnesota
  • 2. ROR icon University of Melbourne
  • 3. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 4. ROR icon ETH Zurich
  • 5. ROR icon Brown University
  • 6. ROR icon Indiana University Bloomington

Abstract

Despite the theory for both Rayleigh and Love waves being well accepted and the theoretical predictions accurately matching observations, the direct observation of their quantifiable decay with depth has never been measured in the Earth's crust. In this work, we present observations of the quantifiable decay with depth of surface‐wave eigenfunctions. This is done by making direct observations of both Rayleigh‐wave and Love‐wave eigenfunction amplitudes over a range of depths using data collected at the 3D Homestake array for a suite of nearby mine blasts. Observations of amplitudes over a range of frequencies from 0.4 to 1.2 Hz are consistent with theoretical eigenfunction predictions. They show a clear exponential decay of amplitudes with increasing depth and a reversal in sign of the radial‐component Rayleigh‐wave eigenfunction at large depths, as predicted for fundamental‐mode Rayleigh waves. Minor discrepancies between the observed eigenfunctions and those predicted using estimates of the local velocity structure suggest that the observed eigenfunctions could be used to improve the velocity model. Our results confirm that both Rayleigh and Love waves have the depth dependence that they have long been assumed to have. This is an important direct validation of a classic theoretical result in geophysics and provides new observational evidence that classical seismological surface‐wave theory can be used to accurately infer properties of Earth structure and earthquake sources.

Additional Information

© 2019 Seismological Society of America. Manuscript received 7 February 2019; Published Online 25 June 2019. Data and Resources: Data presented here were collected at the Homestake 3D seismometer array. The data are available at the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS) Data Management Center available at www.iris.edu (last accessed July 2018), designation X6. Finding a model to fit dispersion data was done using Computer Programs in Seismology, v.3.30, at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqccps.html (last accessed March 2016). The authors are grateful to staff at the Sanford Underground Research Facility and Program for the Array Seismic Studies of the Continental Lithosphere (PASSCAL) for their assistance. Specifically, they thank Jaret Heise, Tom Regan, Bryce Pietzyk, and Jamey Tollefson. Vital technical contributions related to the operation and maintenance of the Homestake 3D seismometer array were made by Terry Stigall. The authors also thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. This work was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) INSPIRE (Integrated NSF Support Promoting Interdisciplinary Research and Education) Grant PHY1344265. Parts of this research were conducted by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery (OzGrav), through Project Number CE170100004. The authors are grateful for computational resources provided by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational‐Wave Observatory (LIGO) Laboratory and supported by National Science Foundation Grants PHY‐0757058 and PHY‐0823459.

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
96682
DOI
10.1785/0120190026
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20190625-083425940

Related works

Describes
10.1785/0120190026 (DOI)

Funding

NSF
PHY-1344265
Australian Research Council
CE170100004
NSF
PHY‐0757058
NSF
PHY‐0823459

Dates

Created
2019-06-25
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2021-11-16
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata