Reply to van Hoorn: Converging lines of evidence
Creators
- Henrich, Joseph1
- Boyd, Robert2
- McElreath, Richard3
- Gurven, Michael4
- Richerson, Peter J.3
- Ensminger, Jean5
- Alvard, Michael6
- Barr, Abigail7
- Barrett, H. Clark2
- Bolyanatz, Alexander8
-
Camerer, Colin F.5
- Cardenas, Juan-Camilo9
- Fehr, Ernst10
- Gintis, Herbert M.11
- Gil-White, Francisco
- Gwako, Edwins Laban12
- Henrich, Natalie13, 14
- Hill, Kim15
- Lesorogol, Carolyn16
- Patton, John Q.17
- Marlowe, Frank W.18
- Tracer, David P.19
- Ziker, John20
-
1.
University of British Columbia
-
2.
University of California, Los Angeles
-
3.
University of California, Davis
-
4.
University of California, Santa Barbara
-
5.
California Institute of Technology
-
6.
Texas A&M University
-
7.
University of Nottingham
-
8.
College of DuPage
-
9.
Universidad de Los Andes
-
10.
University of Zurich
-
11.
Santa Fe Institute
-
12.
Guilford College
-
13.
Providence Health Care
-
14.
Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences
-
15.
Arizona State University
-
16.
Washington University in St. Louis
-
17.
California State University, Fullerton
-
18.
University of Cambridge
-
19.
University of Colorado Denver
-
20.
Boise State University
Abstract
We agree with the comments by van Hoorn (1) on our critique (2): testing causal hypotheses about human behavior is a challenge (1, 3). Making progress requires specifying alternative hypotheses and then testing these hypotheses using diverse and converging lines of evidence. We have defended the hypothesis that social norms, which culturally coevolved with the institutions of large-scale societies including markets, influence economic decision-making. This hypothesis emerged from a larger set that we developed both at the outset of our project and as we went along. Our interdisciplinary team's initial list of hypotheses included the idea that experimental games might spark an innate reciprocity module that would yield little variation across populations.
Additional Information
© 2012 National Academy of Sciences. Published online before print June 18, 2012. Author contributions: J.H., R.B., R.M., M.G., J.E., and J.-C.C. designed research; J.H., R.M., M.G., J.E., M.A., A. Barr, H.C.B., A. Bolyanatz, J.-C.C., F.G.-W., E.L.G., N.H., K.H., C.L., J.Q.P., F.W.M., D.P.T., and J.Z. performed research; J.H., R.B., R.M., J.E., and A. Barr analyzed data; and J.H., R.B., R.M., M.G., P.J.R., J.E., A. Barr, C.F.C., E.F., and H.M.G. wrote the paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest.Attached Files
Published - Henrich2012p18967P_Natl_Acad_Sci_Usa.pdf
Files
Henrich2012p18967P_Natl_Acad_Sci_Usa.pdf
Additional details
Identifiers
- PMCID
- PMC3387063
- Eprint ID
- 32811
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20120731-083311474
Dates
- Created
-
2012-07-31Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-09Created from EPrint's last_modified field