Published July 1, 2024 | Version Published
Journal Article

The where, when, and how of ooid formation: What ooids tell us about ancient seawater chemistry

Abstract

Ooids are a common constituent of carbonate rock throughout the last 3.2 billion years. The chemical and physical characteristics of ooids record essential details of the carbonate chemistry and hydrodynamic conditions of their depositional environment. As a result, ooids may be a powerful tool for reconstructing Earth's ancient climates and environments. However, lack of constraints on fundamental aspects of ooid formation, such as the role of abrasion, underscores the potential for additional discoveries utilizing ooids as paleoenvironmental proxies. Here, we use three-dimensional models built by serially grinding and imaging ooids to show how ooid shape changes during growth. We find that ooid abrasion plays only a small role in the formation of ooids, even in giant ooids, where the mass should cause abrasion to be most intense. A lack of abrasion during ooid formation suggests a greater sensitivity of ooid distribution and size to the chemistry of depositional environments. This insight enables us to harmonize our understanding of ooid formation with longstanding questions regarding their spatial and temporal distribution, as well as size variations. With a new database of ooid occurrences, we analyze the influence of seawater chemistry, carbonate shelf area, and evolutionary developments on ooid abundance in the Modern, Last Glacial Period, and throughout the Phanerozoic. Finally, we leverage our new understanding of ooid growth to show how ooid size, including giant ooids, can shed light on relative changes in alkalinity throughout the Phanerozoic.

    Copyright and License

    © 2024 Elsevier.

    Acknowledgement

    We thank I. Buynevich and A. Balzani for use of the camsizer. A. Krokhine and E. Cano assisted data collection. F. Simons assisted with spherical harmonic analyses. J. Husson for his help with xDD. M. Nadeau provided geochemical insights. This manuscript is much improved based on the thoughtful reviews of L. Kah, A. Immenhauser, two anonymous reviewers, and the editor, H. Bao. S. MacLennan, C. Rose, J. Strauss, S. Edmonsond, D. Lehrmann and N. Anderson provided samples. We thank D. Jerolmack, G. Domokos, and A. Sipos for discussions about abrasion and 3D geometry. This work was supported by NSF Earth Sciences Grant 1028768 to A. Maloof.

    Contributions

    Bolton Howes: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Akshay Mehra: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Emily Geyman: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Julia Wilcots: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Ryan Manzuk: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Curtis Deutsch: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Adam Maloof: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

    Conflict of Interest

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Additional details

    Funding

    National Science Foundation
    EAR-1028768