Published February 2009 | Version Published
Journal Article Open

Learning and Visceral Temptation in Dynamic Saving Experiments

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology

Abstract

This paper tests two explanations for apparent undersaving in life cycle models: bounded rationality and a preference for immediacy. Each was addressed in a separate experimental study. In the first study, subjects saved too little initially—providing evidence for bounded rationality—but learned to save optimally within four repeated life cycles. In the second study, thirsty subjects who consume beverage sips immediately, rather than with a delay, show greater relative overspending, consistent with quasi-hyperbolic discounting models. The parameter estimates of overspending obtained from the second study, but not the first, are in range of several empirical studies of saving (with an estimated β = 0.6–0.7).

Additional Information

© 2009 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. This research was supported by NSF grant SES-0078911. We thank Chris Carroll, Daniel Houser, Paul Kattman, George Loewenstein, Tanga McDaniel, John Hey, Nat Wilcox, three anonymous referees and editor Ed Glaeser for helpful comments. We also thank Julie Malmquist of the SSEL lab, Chong Juin Kuan (NUS), Hackjin Kim, Tony Bruguier, and especially Min Jeong Kang (who ran several of the beverage-condition subjects herself) for help in doing the experiments.

Attached Files

Published - The_Quarterly_Journal_of_Economics-2009-Brown-197-231.pdf

Files

The_Quarterly_Journal_of_Economics-2009-Brown-197-231.pdf

Files (2.0 MB)

Name Size
md5:083728f53a743f6be64f590d65f49bb3
2.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
22287
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20110217-073614742

Funding

NSF
SES-0078911

Dates

Created
2011-03-09
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2021-11-09
Created from EPrint's last_modified field