Published October 11, 2018 | Version Published + Accepted Version
Journal Article Open

Where are the most ancient stars in the Milky Way?

  • 1. ROR icon University of California, Berkeley
  • 2. ROR icon University of Sydney
  • 3. ROR icon University of California, Davis
  • 4. ROR icon The University of Texas at Austin
  • 5. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 6. ROR icon Northwestern University
  • 7. ROR icon University of California, San Diego

Abstract

The oldest stars in the Milky Way (MW) bear imprints of the Galaxy's early assembly history. We use FIRE cosmological zoom-in simulations of three MW-mass disc galaxies to study the spatial distribution, chemistry, and kinematics of the oldest surviving stars (z_(form) ≳ 5) in MW-like galaxies. We predict the oldest stars to be less centrally concentrated at z = 0 than stars formed at later times as a result of two processes. First, the majority of the oldest stars are not formed in situ but are accreted during hierarchical assembly. These ex situ stars are deposited on dispersion-supported, halo-like orbits but dominate over old stars formed in situ in the solar neighbourhood, and in some simulations, even in the galactic centre. Secondly, old stars formed in situ are driven outwards by bursty star formation and energetic feedback processes that create a time-varying gravitational potential at z ≳ 2, similar to the process that creates dark matter cores and expands stellar orbits in bursty dwarf galaxies. The total fraction of stars that are ancient is more than an order of magnitude higher for sight lines away from the bulge and inner halo than for inward-looking sight lines. Although the task of identifying specific stars as ancient remains challenging, we anticipate that million-star spectral surveys and photometric surveys targeting metal-poor stars already include hundreds of stars formed before z = 5. We predict most of these targets to have higher metallicity (-3 < [Fe/H] < -2) than the most extreme metal-poor stars.

Additional Information

© 2018 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices). Accepted 2018 July 8. Received 2018 June 1; in original form 2018 April 2. Published: 14 July 2018. We have benefited from fruitful discussions with K.C. Freeman, A. Karakas, S. Loebman, C.F. McKee, and S. Tabin. KE acknowledges support from a Berkeley graduate fellowship, a Hellman award for graduate study, and an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. JBH acknowledges a Miller Professorship from the Miller Institute, UC Berkeley. JBH is also supported by an ARC Laureate Fellowship from the Australian Government. AW was supported by NASA through grants HST-GO-14734 and HST-AR-15057 from STScI. EQ and KE are supported by a Simons Investigator Award from the Simons Foundation and by NSF grant AST-1715070. DRW is supported by a fellowship provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. MBK acknowledges support from NSF grant AST-1517226 and CAREER grant AST-1752913 and from NASA grants NNX17AG29G and HST-AR-13888, HST-AR-13896, HST-AR-14282, HST-AR-14554, HST-AR-15006, HST-GO-12914, and HST-GO-14191 from STScI. Support for PFH was provided by an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship, NASA ATP Grant NNX14AH35G, and NSF Collaborative Research Grant #1411920 and CAREER grant #1455342. CAFG was supported by NSF through grants AST-1412836, AST-1517491, AST-1715216, and CAREER award AST-1652522, by NASA through grant NNX15AB22G, and by a Cottrell Scholar Award from the Research Corporation for Science Advancement. DK was supported by NSF grants AST-1412153 and AST-1715101 and the Cottrell Scholar Award from the Research Corporation for Science Advancement. Support for SGK was provided by NASA through Einstein Postdoctoral Fellowship grant number PF5-160136 awarded by the Chandra X-ray Center, which is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory for NASA under contract NAS8-03060. We ran numerical calculations on the Caltech compute cluster 'Wheeler,' allocations TG-AST130039 & TG-AST150080 granted by the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) supported by the NSF, and the NASA HEC Program through the NAS Division at Ames Research Center and the NCCS at Goddard Space Flight Center. The analysis in this paper relied on the PYTHON packages NumPy (Van Der Walt, Colbert & Varoquaux 2011), Matplotlib (Hunter 2007), and AstroPy (Astropy Collaboration 2013).

Attached Files

Published - sty1864.pdf

Accepted Version - 1804.00659.pdf

Accepted Version - nihms-997004.pdf

Files

1804.00659.pdf

Files (11.9 MB)

Name Size
md5:2218777558c50e9dfb2f466c240a9a94
2.4 MB Preview Download
md5:c3876083161954465ce3c95be050a4af
3.0 MB Preview Download
md5:dd76aa6349f385fcc0dcdfb6aaee7633
6.4 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

PMCID
PMC6301095
Eprint ID
89597
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20180912-153417896

Related works

Funding

University of California, Berkeley
Hellman Fellowship
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
Australian Research Council
NASA
HST-GO-14734
NASA
HST-AR-15057
Simons Foundation
NSF
AST-1715070
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
NSF
AST-1517226
NSF
AST-1752913
NASA
NNX17AG29G
NASA
HST-AR-13888
NASA
HST-AR-13896
NASA
HST-AR-14282
NASA
HST-AR-14554
NASA
HST-AR-15006
NASA
HST-GO-12914
NASA
HST-GO-14191
NASA
NNX14AH35G
NSF
AST-1411920
NSF
AST-1455342
NSF
AST-1412836
NSF
AST-1517491
NSF
AST-1715216
NSF
AST-1652522
NASA
NNX15AB22G
Cottrell Scholar of Research Corporation
NSF
AST-1412153
NSF
AST-1715101
NASA Einstein Fellowship
PF5-160136
NASA
NAS8-03060
NSF
TG-AST130039
NSF
TG-AST150080

Dates

Created
2018-09-12
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2023-01-05
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
TAPIR , Astronomy Department