Published February 2020 | Version Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Reevaluation of Perchlorate in Gale Crater Rocks Suggests Geologically Recent Perchlorate Addition

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 2. ROR icon Johnson Space Center
  • 3. ROR icon Rice University
  • 4. ROR icon Stony Brook University

Abstract

Perchlorate (ClO₄⁻) was discovered in Martian soil by the Phoenix lander, with important implications for potential Martian biology, photochemistry, aqueous chemistry, and the chlorine cycle on Mars. Perchlorate was subsequently reported in both loose sediment and bedrock samples analyzed by the Sample Analysis at Mars instrument onboard the Curiosity rover in Gale crater based on a release of O₂ at 200–500°C. However, the continually wet paleoenvironment recorded by the sedimentary rocks in Gale crater was not conducive to the deposition of highly soluble salts. Furthermore, the preservation of ancient perchlorate to the modern day is unexpected due to its low thermodynamic stability and radiolytic decomposition associated with its long exposure to radioactivity and cosmic radiation. We therefore investigate alternative sources of O₂ in Sample Analysis at Mars analyses including superoxides, sulfates, nitrate, and nanophase iron and manganese oxides. Geochemical evidence and oxygen release patterns observed by Curiosity are inconsistent with each of these alternatives. We conclude that perchlorate is indeed the most likely source of the detected O2 release at 200–500°C, but contend that it is unlikely to be ancient. Rather than being associated with the lacustrine or early diagenetic environment, the most likely origin of perchlorate in the bedrock is late stage addition by downward percolation of water through rock pore space during transient wetting events in the Amazonian. The conclusion that the observed perchlorate in Gale crater is most likely Amazonian suggests the presence of recent liquid water at the modern surface.

Additional Information

© 2020 American Geophysical Union. Received 7 AUG 2019; Accepted 16 JAN 2020; Accepted article online 30 JAN 2020. We thank Brad Sutter for many thoughtful and spirited debates which improved this manuscript. We also thank the SAM and Curiosity teams for their support in rover operations, without which this work would not be possible. SAM data are available on the Planetary Data System (PDS; pds‐geosciences.wustl.edu/missions/msl/sam.htm). Additional data used in this study are available on the CaltechDATA repository at https://doi.org/10.22002/D1.1299. Funding was provided by NASA.

Attached Files

Published - Martin_et_al-2020-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Planets.pdf

Supplemental Material - jgre21292-sup-0001-2019je006156-si.docx

Files

Martin_et_al-2020-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Planets.pdf

Files (5.5 MB)

Name Size
md5:a5000744260fb1fdcca4f17eecab127c
4.7 MB Download
md5:67bf2afda38cea15b071c04cfabd76bf
773.4 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
101652
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20200302-130340431

Related works

Describes
10.22002/D1.1299 (DOI)

Funding

NASA

Dates

Created
2020-03-02
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2023-06-01
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata