Published May 10, 2014 | Version public
Book Section - Chapter

Face Recognition Human–Machine Comparison Under Heavy Lighting

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology

Abstract

We demonstrate the performance of the Fisherface method for face recognition compared to human eye and simple Eigenface method. These methods do not involve many adjustable parameters. Images undergo the principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The goal of the work is a detailed comparison of the rates of false recognition between the computer vision methods and human perception. We find that humans show more flexibility and perform perfectly on easy tasks, whereas on tasks that are impossible to humans, Fisherface method also fails.

Additional Information

© 2015 Springer Japan. First Online: 10 May 2014.

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
78306
DOI
10.1007/978-4-431-54439-5_27
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20170616-154714681

Dates

Created
2017-06-16
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2021-11-15
Created from EPrint's last_modified field