Published March 2021 | Version Published
Journal Article Open

Thank You to Our 2020 Peer Reviewers

  • 1. ROR icon Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  • 2. ROR icon University of California, Irvine
  • 3. ROR icon Duke University
  • 4. ROR icon The University of Texas at Austin
  • 5. ROR icon University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
  • 6. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 7. ROR icon Jet Propulsion Lab
  • 8. ROR icon ETH Zurich
  • 9. ROR icon Old Dominion University
  • 10. ROR icon Dartmouth College
  • 11. ROR icon Colorado School of Mines
  • 12. ROR icon Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology
  • 13. ROR icon Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • 14. ROR icon University of Bologna
  • 15. ROR icon University of California, Santa Cruz
  • 16. ROR icon United States Geological Survey
  • 17. ROR icon Florida State University
  • 18. ROR icon Max Planck Institute for Meteorology
  • 19. ROR icon University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
  • 20. ROR icon Lehigh University
  • 21. ROR icon Peking University

Abstract

Thank you to the reviewers of AGU Advances. In 2020, we all faced the enormous and unexpected challenges of the Covid‐19 pandemic, with its host of new and competing demands on our time. Thus, we are especially grateful to the 154 people who provided reviews for AGU Advances and helped our fledgling journal complete its first year. Peer‐review is essential to the process of doing and publishing science, and our reviewers have helped define our new journal by indicating papers expected to have broad impact that advance a discipline, have broad impact across disciplines, or have policy relevance. All papers submitted to AGU Advances first go through an editorial consultation. We are committed to respecting reviewers' time and only send papers for review that the consulting editors agree meet our criteria. Sometimes this means we send papers back to the authors with suggestions how to improve the fit to our journal. Another way we try to streamline the review process is by giving the authors the option to transfer reviews if after review we decide the paper is better suited to another AGU journal. As a relatively new journal, we still have few enough reviewers that we do not want to identify them by name. Nonetheless, you know who you are. Please accept our sincere thanks for generously sharing your expertise and working to improve AGU Advances.

Additional Information

© 2021. The Authors. Issue Online: 18 March 2021; Version of Record online: 18 March 2021; Manuscript accepted: 01 March 2021; Manuscript received: 01 March 2021.

Attached Files

Published - 2021AV000426.pdf

Files

2021AV000426.pdf

Files (137.7 kB)

Name Size
md5:c0ec6ea362bb056b502c5fcb3a03c62e
137.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
108915
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20210503-084607194

Dates

Created
2021-05-03
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2021-05-03
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata