Published June 2001 | Version public
Book Section - Chapter

Time Division is Better Than Frequency Division for Periodic Internet Broadcast of Dynamic Data

Abstract

We consider two ways to send items over a broadcast channel and compare them using the metric of expected waiting time. The first is frequency division, where each item is broadcast on its own subchannel of lower bandwidth. We find the optimal allocation of bandwidth to the subchannels for this method. Then we look at time division, where items are sent sequentially on a single full-bandwidth channel. We show that for any frequency division broadcast schedule, we can find a better time division schedule. Thus time division is better than frequency division.

Additional Information

© 2001 IEEE. Date of Current Version: 07 August 2002. This research was partially supported by the Lee Center for Advanced Networking at Caltech.

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
27823
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20111117-083940997

Funding

Caltech Lee Center for Advanced Networking

Dates

Created
2011-11-17
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2021-11-09
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Other Numbering System Name
INSPEC Accession Number
Other Numbering System Identifier
7086684