Published October 2020 | Version Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

U-Pb dating of overpressure veins in late Archean shales reveals six episodes of Paleoproterozoic deformation and fluid flow in the Pilbara craton

  • 1. ROR icon University of Western Australia
  • 2. ROR icon China University of Geosciences
  • 3. ROR icon University of Silesia
  • 4. ROR icon California Institute of Technology

Abstract

Fluid flow in the upper crust not only impacts the redistribution of heat and elements, driving the formation of economic ore deposits, but it also exerts control on metamorphism, metasomatism, and deformation. However, reconstructing the history of fluid flow in ancient basins is exceedingly difficult, particularly in Archean sedimentary rocks because of extensive overprinting and recrystallization. Here, we report U-Pb ages for monazite and xenotime that grew in bedding-parallel veins in 2.63–2.5-b.y.-old shales along the southern Pilbara craton, Australia. The U-Pb ages define six discrete populations, at 2.41 Ga, 2.30 Ga, 2.20 Ga, 2.10 Ga, 2.05 Ga, and 1.66 Ga, which formed ≥200 m.y. after deposition. The abundance of bedding-parallel crack-seal and fibrous veins in banded iron formations (BIFs) and underlying shales suggests a history of episodic buildup of fluid pressure followed by microfracturing, fluid expulsion, and mineral growth. Thermometry of vein minerals indicates temperatures between 230 °C and 320 °C, implicating the migration of hydrothermal fluids. The development of bedding-parallel veins at 2.41 Ga, 2.20 Ga, and 1.66 Ga was coeval with regional orogenic events known to have affected the craton, whereas vein growth at 2.30 Ga, 2.10 Ga, and 2.05 Ga reveals new episodes of deformation and fluid flow. Our results show that well-preserved Archean shales devoid of structural fabrics and >150 km inboard of the craton margin preserve a cryptic history of fluid overpressure, crack-seal vein development, and hydrothermal fluid flow between 2.41 and 1.66 b.y. ago.

Additional Information

© 2020 Geological Society of America. Manuscript received 17 February 2020; Revised manuscript received 24 April 2020; Manuscript accepted 29 April 2020. We acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council (DP140100512 to Rasmussen; DP190102237 to Rasmussen and Muhling), the State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources (China) Open Research Grant GPMR201802 (Rasmussen), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 4187306 (Zi). Scanning electron microscopy was performed at the Centre for Microscopy, Characterization and Analysis at the University of Western Australia (Perth), a node of Microscopy Australia, funded from university and government sources. Ion microprobe analyses were done at the John de Laeter (JdL) Centre, Perth, Australia. We thank Fernando Corfu and two anonymous reviewers for their comments.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - G47526_SuppMat.pdf

Files

G47526_SuppMat.pdf

Files (246.7 kB)

Name Size
md5:f67d9f61429140c74b284a6edb687bdb
246.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
103992
DOI
10.1130/g47526.1
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20200624-101732608

Related works

Describes
10.1130/g47526.1 (DOI)

Funding

Australian Research Council
DP140100512
Australian Research Council
DP190102237
State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources
GPMR201802
National Natural Science Foundation of China
4187306

Dates

Created
2020-06-24
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2023-07-11
Created from EPrint's last_modified field