Published October 29, 2013 | Version Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States

  • 1. ROR icon The University of Texas at Austin
  • 2. ROR icon Aerodyne Research
  • 3. ROR icon Arizona State University
  • 4. ROR icon Texas A&M University
  • 5. ROR icon Washington State University
  • 6. ROR icon Colorado School of Mines
  • 7. ROR icon University of California, Berkeley
  • 8. ROR icon California Institute of Technology

Abstract

Engineering estimates of methane emissions from natural gas production have led to varied projections of national emissions. This work reports direct measurements of methane emissions at 190 onshore natural gas sites in the United States (150 production sites, 27 well completion flowbacks, 9 well unloadings, and 4 workovers). For well completion flowbacks, which clear fractured wells of liquid to allow gas production, methane emissions ranged from 0.01 Mg to 17 Mg (mean = 1.7 Mg; 95% confidence bounds of 0.67–3.3 Mg), compared with an average of 81 Mg per event in the 2011 EPA national emission inventory from April 2013. Emission factors for pneumatic pumps and controllers as well as equipment leaks were both comparable to and higher than estimates in the national inventory. Overall, if emission factors from this work for completion flowbacks, equipment leaks, and pneumatic pumps and controllers are assumed to be representative of national populations and are used to estimate national emissions, total annual emissions from these source categories are calculated to be 957 Gg of methane (with sampling and measurement uncertainties estimated at ±200 Gg). The estimate for comparable source categories in the EPA national inventory is ∼1,200 Gg. Additional measurements of unloadings and workovers are needed to produce national emission estimates for these source categories. The 957 Gg in emissions for completion flowbacks, pneumatics, and equipment leaks, coupled with EPA national inventory estimates for other categories, leads to an estimated 2,300 Gg of methane emissions from natural gas production (0.42% of gross gas production).

Additional Information

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences. Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. Edited by Susan L. Brantley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, and approved August 19, 2013 (received for review March 20, 2013). We thank the sponsors of this work for financial support, technical advice, and access to sites for sampling. The sponsors were Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, BG Group plc, Chevron, Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc., Pioneer Natural Resources Company, SWEPI LP (Shell), Southwestern Energy, Talisman Energy USA, and XTO Energy, an ExxonMobil subsidiary. Funding for EDF's methane research series, including the University of Texas study, is provided for by Fiona and Stan Druckenmiller, Heising-Simons Foundation, Bill and Susan Oberndorf, Betsy and Sam Reeves, Robertson Foundation, Tom Steyer, Kat Taylor, and the Walton Family Foundation. Author contributions: D.T.A. and M.H. designed research; D.T.A., V.M.T., J.T., D.W.S., M.H., A.H., and S.C.H. performed research; C.E.K., M.P.F., A.D.H., B.K.L., J.M., R.F.S., and J.H.S. analyzed data; and D.T.A. wrote the paper. Conflict of interest statement: J.M. holds a joint appointment with Barree & Associates and the Colorado School of Mines. She has also served as an advisor to Nexen in 2012. D.T.A. served as a consultant for the Eastern Research Group and ExxonMobil in 2012, and is the current chair of the Science Advisory Board for the EPA. J.H.S. has served as a consultant for Shell in 2012. D.T.A., M.H., C.E.K., and R.F.S. variously serve as members of scientific advisory panels for projects supported by Environmental Defense Fund and companies involved in the natural gas supply chain. These projects are led at Colorado State University (on natural gas gathering and processing), Washington State University (on local distribution of natural gas), and the University of West Virginia (on CNG fueling and use in heavy duty vehicles). This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1304880110/-/DCSupplemental.

Attached Files

Published - PNAS-2013-Allen-17768-73.pdf

Supplemental Material - sapp.pdf

Files

PNAS-2013-Allen-17768-73.pdf

Files (3.4 MB)

Name Size
md5:663e1ca866efab42813b4dea9234ed43
979.1 kB Preview Download
md5:406229cc3345a439a77db843e32e95ad
2.4 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

PMCID
PMC3816463
Eprint ID
42919
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20131210-101910500

Funding

Environmental Defense Fund
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
BG Group plc
Chevron
Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
Pioneer Natural Resources Company
SWEPI LP (Shell)
Southwestern Energy
Talisman Energy USA
XTO Energy
Exxon Mobil
Fiona and Stan Druckenmiller
Heising-Simons Foundation
Bill and Susan Obernorf
Betsy and Sam Reeves
Robertson Foundation
Tom Steyer
Kat Taylor
Walton Family Foundation

Dates

Created
2013-12-10
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2021-11-10
Created from EPrint's last_modified field