Published September 1996 | Version Published
Journal Article Open

The explanation of the Trouton–Noble experiment revisited

  • 1. ROR icon Cornell University

Abstract

One class of explanations of the null result of the Trouton–Noble experiment uses the "standard" definitions of electromagnetic energy and momentum but is quite complicated. Another class is much simpler but appears to require new definitions of electromagnetic energy and momentum. We reconcile the two sets of explanations and show that they are both physically correct. We use the same arguments that have been used in discussions of the famous "4/3" factor in the electromagnetic mass of the classical electron.

Additional Information

© 1996 American Association of Physics Teachers. I thank Kurt Gottfried for interesting me in this problem, and thank him and David Mermin for helpful discussions. This work was supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation.

Attached Files

Published - 1.18329.pdf

Files

1.18329.pdf

Files (647.0 kB)

Name Size
md5:4edc051a2a4eb5c9feee20bdd3e992ce
647.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
88290
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20180725-160852372

Funding

NSF

Dates

Created
2018-07-25
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2021-11-16
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Physics Department