Published March 12, 2026 | Version In Press
Journal Article

Rayleigh Wave Ellipticity and Off-Great-Circle Propagation Across the Los Angeles Basin via Dense Seismic Surveying

  • 1. ROR icon University of Utah
  • 2. ROR icon Institute of Geophysics
  • 3. ROR icon California Institute of Technology

Abstract

We deployed a temporary nodal array in and around the Los Angeles basin, comprising 273 nodal geophone seismometers, structured by two dense lines (interstation spacing of ∼0.6 km) and a 2D distributed or shotgun array (spacing of ∼2 km), which significantly densified the station coverage in the area. We compute multicomponent ambient-noise cross correlations between all stations available in Southern California, including broadbands and accelerometers from the regional networks and broadband and nodal stations from temporary experiments. We observe clear fundamental-mode Rayleigh waves in the period band of 5–9 s and measure the Rayleigh wave ellipticity, or horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) amplitude ratios. Furthermore, we correct the measurements to account for off-great-circle propagation due to lateral velocity variations. The measured Rayleigh wave ellipticity depicts the basin's lateral boundaries, where higher and lower H/V are generally observed within and outside of the basin, respectively. We compare our findings with the predicted H/V ratios from the Statewide California Earthquake Center Community Velocity Model (CVM). Clear discrepancies are observed near the Central and the West Coast basins, where the depth velocity gradients of the CVM are likely too low and too high, respectively. Because an accurate basin model is important to earthquake ground-motion prediction, our newly acquired results demonstrate the utility of dense nodal arrays for shallow imaging in a densely populated urban setting for seismic hazard assessment.

Copyright and License

© 2026 Seismological Society of America.

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful for the efforts of the deployment team to install ∼270 nodal stations within the Los Angeles basin (LAB) and the volunteers from the broader Statewide California Earthquake Center (SCEC) community that agreed to host nodal stations at their properties. The authors would like to thank Allison Bent for handling this article and Francisco J. Sánchez‐Sesma and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive reviews. This research was supported by the SCEC based on Award Number DE‐SC0016520 from the U.S. Department of Energy. K. G. acknowledges a scholarship by the Alexander S. Onassis Foundation (Scholarship ID: F ZO 02‐1/2018–2019). This study was also partially supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) Grants EAR 2438772 and 2438773. This work was supported by a subsidy from the Polish Ministry of Education and Science for the Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences.

Data Availability

The LAB2022 waveform data from this study are publicly available to download from the Earthscope Data Management Center (DMC) under network code 6W (Lin et al., 2022). The data from the Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN) broadband network are available from the Southern California Earthquake Data Center (SCEDC; https://scedc.caltech.edu (last accessed February 2026), doi: 10.7909/C3WD3xH1, under the network CI). Rayleigh wave horizontal‐to‐vertical (H/V) measurements are available to download from doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16787 081. All network codes are available at the following DOIs: CI: 10.7914/SN/CI; AZ: 10.7914/SN/AZ; YN: 10.7914/SN/YN_2010; NP: 10.7914/SN/NP; CE: 10.7914/b34q-bb70); BC: 10.7914/SN/BC; NN: 10.7914/SN/NN; 6W: 10.7914/36n1-zm78; and XI: 10.7914/SN/XI_2014.

Additional details

Funding

Southern California Earthquake Center
United States Department of Energy
DE‐SC0016520
Alexander S. Onassis Foundation
F ZO 02‐1/2018–2019
National Science Foundation
EAR-2438772
National Science Foundation
EAR-2438773
Ministry of Science and Higher Education
Polish Academy of Sciences

Caltech Custom Metadata