Published July 1993 | Version public
Journal Article

Reply to "Note on isotope sputtering"

  • 1. ROR icon University of North Texas
  • 2. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 3. ROR icon California State University, Long Beach

Abstract

In his note commenting on the ^(92)Mo-^(100)Mo isotopic fractionation results of Weathers et al., Sigmund raises questions about the experimental procedures used in these measurements. Specifically, he suggests that isotopic fractionation effects may be present in the SIMS analysis of the carbon collector foils; and, based on conventional sputtering theory, he further suggests that these effects may be as large as 50% of the fractionation from the molybdenum targets themselves, if only a small fraction of the molybdenum was removed from the foils. He also raises questions about the possible relationship between changes in the yield and fractionation versus ion fluence.

Additional Information

© 1993 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Received 23 March 1993.

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
50563
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20141020-140006770

Dates

Created
2014-10-20
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2021-11-10
Created from EPrint's last_modified field