Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research
Creators
-
1.
University of California, Berkeley
-
2.
California Institute of Technology
-
3.
Stanford University
-
4.
University of California, Riverside
-
5.
Yale University
-
6.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
-
7.
Columbia University
-
8.
University of Virginia
-
9.
Center for Open Science
-
10.
University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
There is growing appreciation for the advantages of experimentation in the social sciences. Policy-relevant claims that in the past were backed by theoretical arguments and inconclusive correlations are now being investigated using more credible methods. Changes have been particularly pronounced in development economics, where hundreds of randomized trials have been carried out over the last decade. When experimentation is difficult or impossible, researchers are using quasi-experimental designs. Governments and advocacy groups display a growing appetite for evidence-based policy-making. In 2005, Mexico established an independent government agency to rigorously evaluate social programs, and in 2012, the U.S. Office of Management and Budget advised federal agencies to present evidence from randomized program evaluations in budget requests (1, 2).
Additional Information
© 2014 American Association for the Advancement of Science. We thank C. Christiano, M. Kremer, G. Kroll, J. Wang, and seminar participants for comments.Attached Files
Accepted Version - nihms605501.pdf
Files
nihms605501.pdf
Additional details
Identifiers
- PMCID
- PMC4103621
- Eprint ID
- 43540
- DOI
- 10.1126/science.1245317
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20140128-134638275
Dates
- Created
-
2014-01-29Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-10Created from EPrint's last_modified field