Published December 1985
| Version Campus-Access Only
Journal Article
Sophisticated voting outcomes and agenda control
Creators
Abstract
Necessary and sufficient conditions for an alternative to be a sophisticated voting outcome under an amendment procedure are derived. The uncovered set, as first defined by Miller (1980), is shown to be potentially reducible, and conditions are determined for which this reduction equals the set of sophisticated voting outcomes. In addition, simple methods are given for calculating both the uncovered set and its reduction.
Additional Information
© 1985 Springer. Received May 15, 1984. Accepted September 10, 1984. Presented at the 1984 Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, Phoenix AZ, March 1984. I would like to thank Gerald Kramer, Nicholas Miller, Norman Schofield, two anonymous referees, and especially Richard McKelvey for helpful suggestions and comments.External Files
Files attached to this record are restricted to users connected to the Caltech campus network:
- sswp 524 - published - sswp524_-_published.pdf
Additional details
Identifiers
- Eprint ID
- 67319
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20160524-154536814
Dates
- Created
-
2016-05-25Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-11Created from EPrint's last_modified field