Published May 16, 2022 | Version Published
Journal Article Open

Thank You to Our 2021 Peer Reviewers

  • 1. ROR icon Johns Hopkins University
  • 2. ROR icon Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
  • 3. ROR icon University of California, Davis
  • 4. ROR icon University of Tasmania
  • 5. ROR icon University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
  • 6. ROR icon University of Illinois at Chicago
  • 7. ROR icon University of Rhode Island
  • 8. ROR icon Purdue University West Lafayette
  • 9. ROR icon École Normale Supérieure - PSL
  • 10. ROR icon University of California, Los Angeles
  • 11. ROR icon Brown University
  • 12. ROR icon Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
  • 13. ROR icon High Altitude Observatory
  • 14. ROR icon University of California, Irvine
  • 15. ROR icon Boston University
  • 16. ROR icon Iowa State University
  • 17. ROR icon National University of Colombia
  • 18. ROR icon University of Hawaii at Manoa
  • 19. ROR icon Jet Propulsion Lab
  • 20. ROR icon University of Science and Technology of China
  • 21. ROR icon University of Washington
  • 22. ROR icon Peking University
  • 23. ROR icon University of California, Santa Cruz
  • 24. ROR icon University of Calgary

Abstract

On behalf of the journal, AGU, and the scientific community, the editors of Geophysical Research Letters would like to sincerely thank those who reviewed manuscripts for us in 2021. The hours reading and commenting on manuscripts not only improve the manuscripts, but also increase the scientific rigor of future research in the field. With the advent of AGU's data policy, many reviewers have also helped immensely to evaluate the accessibility and availability of data, and many have provided insightful comments that helped to improve the data presentation and quality. We greatly appreciate the assistance of the reviewers in advancing open science, which is a key objective of AGU's data policy. We particularly appreciate the timely reviews in light of the demands imposed by the rapid review process at Geophysical Research Letters. The COVID pandemic continued to impose additional stresses on the review process, as many reviewers had to juggle increased family commitments, hours of online meetings, remote work and instruction, lack of physical access to library resources, and other hardships, to maintain the quality and timeliness of their reviews. We received 4,832 submissions in 2021 and 5,232 reviewers contributed to their evaluation by providing 8,874 reviews in total. Although we witnessed an increase in the number of submissions, the average number of days to complete a review increased only slightly! That says a lot about the diligence of our reviewers. We deeply appreciate their contributions in these challenging times.

Additional Information

© 2022 American Geophysical Union. Issue Online: 29 April 2022; Version of Record online: 29 April 2022; Manuscript accepted: 30 March 2022; Manuscript received: 30 March 2022.

Attached Files

Published - Geophysical_Research_Letters_-_2022_-_Rajaram_-_Thank_You_to_Our_2021_Peer_Reviewers.pdf

Files

Geophysical_Research_Letters_-_2022_-_Rajaram_-_Thank_You_to_Our_2021_Peer_Reviewers.pdf

Files (313.3 kB)

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
115108
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20220609-332176500

Dates

Created
2022-06-13
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2022-06-13
Created from EPrint's last_modified field